Skip to main content



The Moral Argument for God’s Existence.

  An atheist might say you can be good without believing in God. However the question isn’t can you be good without believing in God but can you be good without God? Here’s the problem if there’s no God. What basis remains for objective good or bad, right or wrong? If God does not exist objective moral values do not exist. Here’s why. Without some objective reference point we    really have no way of saying something is up or down. Gods nature however provides an objective reference point for moral values. It’s the standard which all action and thoughts are measured. However, if there is no God then there is no objective reference point. All we are left with is one persons view point as opposed to some other persons view point. This makes morality subjective not objective.  It’s like a preference for vanilla ice cream. The preference is in the subject not the object. Therefore it doesn’t apply to other people. In the same way subjective morality applies only to the subject. It’s not va

Latest Posts

Who are the "sons of God" in Genesis 6?

What is the Gospel?

Chains of Spanish Silver: The Church in the Modern Culture

What Is Dangerous To A Democracy?

Is It Okay to Question Ukraine Spending?

Just Imagine Your Own Personal Documentary.

The Problem of Those Who Have Never Heard of Christ

Pro-Life with No Bible Verse?

Are All the Major World Religions are True?