Skip to main content



The Moral Argument for God’s Existence.

  An atheist might say you can be good without believing in God. However the question isn’t can you be good without believing in God but can you be good without God? Here’s the problem if there’s no God. What basis remains for objective good or bad, right or wrong? If God does not exist objective moral values do not exist. Here’s why. Without some objective reference point we    really have no way of saying something is up or down. Gods nature however provides an objective reference point for moral values. It’s the standard which all action and thoughts are measured. However, if there is no God then there is no objective reference point. All we are left with is one persons view point as opposed to some other persons view point. This makes morality subjective not objective.  It’s like a preference for vanilla ice cream. The preference is in the subject not the object. Therefore it doesn’t apply to other people. In the same way subjective morality applies only to the subject. It’s not va

Do You Need a New Beginning, maybe Forgiveness?

Faith defined

Does God Still Get Angry?

Do Believers No Longer have a Sinful Human Nature?

True or False Believers

Do We Reflect God's Character to the World Around Us?

Knowing Jesus is No Guarantee of "Once Saved Always Saved"

Once Saved NOT Always Saved?

Did Jesus Guarantee "Once Saved Always Saved "?

Should We Hold One Another Accountable?